Prince El Hassan bin Talal: Of sorrow and loss

As the world watches the anguish in Gaza continue, I am moved to reflect on the 10th anniversary of the death of my beloved brother, King Hussein, and my family’s historic involvement in all stages of the tragedy of Palestine…

by Prince El Hassan bin Talal

AMMAN – For the Hashemite family, history is not a series of unconnected events, but a chain of responsibility handed to us by our forebears. The indissoluble interaction of events on both sides of the River Jordan demands positive pressure to resolve what has become a 60-year tragedy for the Palestinian people.

Today the Palestinian people exist in a state of limbo. They enjoy neither statehood nor the status of a protected community. Instead of the reciprocity of two states enjoying equal sovereignty as originally envisaged by the United Nations partition plan, one of these states – Israel – predicates the establishment of the other – Palestine – on its own security, and claims the right to determine whom among the Palestinians it accepts as a valid interlocutor and partner.

This asymmetrical position has unfortunately come to define the approach of those powers, great and small, which have substituted themselves for the United Nations as the ultimate source of legitimacy.

By dividing the Palestinians into two categories, “moderates” and “extremists”, they have effectively endorsed Israel’s position, thus denying the Palestinian people’s right to choose their representatives.

Neither the partition plan of 1947, nor subsequent UN resolutions envisaged or provided for the possibility that Palestine would, for 60 years, become a “temporary” state. The issues of sovereignty in the territories administered in trust by Jordan and later sequestered by Israel remain unresolved, the stark difference in administrations being the Israeli interpretation of the laws of occupation which today has reduced the Palestinian people to the status of unprotected aliens.

The “land for peace” formula extrapolated from UN Security Council resolutions 242 and 338 as the basis for settling the Palestinian and Arab conflicts with Israel was ambiguously phrased. And, in the absence of a comprehensive solution, the rights of untold numbers of refugees and internally displaced persons have never been addressed. Statelessness is growing, and with it the bitterness it engenders.

In 1974, King Hussein acquiesced to the Arab League’s demand to declare the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) “the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people”, empowering the PLO politically. However, Jordan, as a legal sovereign entity, could only cede territory to another sovereign entity. Ironically, the PLO’s status as sole representative is now being questioned by the Palestinian people themselves.

The Middle East is witnessing the development of transitional self-governing institutions. But as the conflict takes its ghastly toll and impedes progress, a temporary international stabilisation agency is needed to ensure a peaceful and normal life for all the inhabitants of Palestine and Israel and to protect all riparians from each other.

My great-grandfather Sharif Hussein’s vision was of a United States of Arabia, in which the historical and cultural particularities of all its regions and peoples would be recognised and respected. Arab renaissance to him meant a covenant with the poor and the marginalised in realising all their inalienable rights. Intra-independence and mutuality still offer the best hope of bringing peace, justice and prosperity to our sorely disrupted and turbulent lands.

King Hussein referred to the peace treaty with Israel, signed in October 1994, as a building block in the achievement of a just, lasting and comprehensive peace between Israel and its neighbours.

The treaty was conceived as a cornerstone on which a regional structure of constituent states, including Palestine, could be built. Within that structure there will be a place for all the peoples of the region on the basis of political reciprocity, respect for cultural diversity, and facilitating the development of supranational structures such as a regional community for water and energy, premised on its contribution to the human environment and dedicated to the preservation of human dignity.

Jordan cannot and will not interfere with the wishes of the Palestinian people, but it will support their right to self-determination. A comprehensive search for peace is everyone’s business. Israelis, Palestinians and all Arabs must recognise that they are part of the problem, and not simply spectators.

* Prince El Hassan bin Talal, brother of the late King Hussein of Jordan, is chairman of several organisations in fields which include diplomacy, interfaith studies, human resources, and science and technology. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) with permission from the Jordan Times. Source: Jordan Times, 9 February 2009, Copyright permission is granted for publication.

4 Kommentare zu “Prince El Hassan bin Talal: Of sorrow and loss

  1. Hallo liebe Cora!

    Danke für d Freundlichen Empfang…  doch ich verrate dir etwas… Ich habe offensichtlich ein paar Fehler geleistet… Ich bin immer noch d Selber, doch habe diesmal meine Nachname weggelassen, und so kam ich rein… Habe einiges geschrieben unter meine Original Name – wobei Tiqvah ist auch Original meine Vorname, doch nicht d Volle Name (Tiqvah Bat Shalom) … – und kam dann nicht mehr rein.. bzw. erschien es nicht mehr…

    Wobei ich verbockt habe? Also ich denke damit da ich mit meine volle Name und HP Adresse unterschrieb, wie ich es meisten tue… diese wurde wohl etwas Krumm genommen, obwohl ich keine Verbrechen daran sah, weil an d Kopfteil kann man mein Name ebenso wie d HP auch sehen… doch ist eben unter Spam gefallen… deshalb habe ich eben mich ohne d Nachname eingetragen…

    Sorry an Alle denen ich damit etwas Verwirrung verursacht habe….



  2. Irgendwie habe ich mit Araber (sog. „Palästinenser“ inbegriffen) und Muslimen auch meine kleines Problem!  Ich glaube ich ihnen mindestens so sehr an der Ernsthaftigkeit und Glaubwürdigkeit an ihre Friedfertigkeit, wie d Frau ihre schwer Alkoholiker Mann, der schon wieder – wie jeden Tag  – aus d Wirtschaft kommen verspricht, keine Alkohol mehr an zu rühren…

    So etwa ist das Wort von Abbas und Co… und alle ihre Unterstützer…

  3. Prinz El Hassan bin Talal vergisst gern einige Details aus der Geschichte der von ihm so sehr bemitleideten Palästinenser. Z.B. dass der UNO-Teilungsplan von 1947 gerade von den Arabern, inkl. den palästinensischen Arabern, abgelehnt wurde und der palästinensische Staat von den palästinensischen Arabern selbst nicht erwünscht war. Dort sind die Anfänge der heutigen Situation zu suchen, bei der Israel über die Entstehung des Staates Palästina entscheidet.
    Auch vergisst er gern, dass das Haschemitische Königreich das Westjordanland nicht, wie er behauptet, treuhänderisch verwaltete, sondern völkerrechtlich wirksam annektierte und an einem palästinensischen Staat nur in den Grenzen des damaligen Israel interessiert war.
    Wozu diese Märchen?
    In einem Punkt hat der Prinz allerdings sehr wohl Recht: Alle Seiten sollten ihre Verantwortung an dem Konflikt erkennen und anerkennen. In Israel haben das die linken Parteien sowie das intellektuelle und mediale Establishment bereits in den 90ern getan, auch wenn es ihnen nicht viel gebracht hat. Die Araber sind an der Reihe. Erst wenn sie soweit sind, kann die Linke in Israel wieder an die Macht kommen, und der Frieden greifbar werden.

Die Kommentarfunktion ist geschlossen.